<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma introduces new 70-200mm lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sigma-bits.com/archives/lens/sigma-apo-70-200mm-f28-ex-dg-macro-hsm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sigma-bits.com/archives/lens/sigma-apo-70-200mm-f28-ex-dg-macro-hsm</link>
	<description>The Independent Weblog About Sigma Gear.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Willy S user</title>
		<link>http://sigma-bits.com/archives/lens/sigma-apo-70-200mm-f28-ex-dg-macro-hsm#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy S user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 04:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sigma-bits.com/archives/lens/sigma-apo-70-200mm-f28-ex-dg-macro-hsm#comment-7</guid>
		<description>When can we have a test of this one?! I wonder how bokeh is. Something I've seen from time to time is that the closer you can focus the worse the bokeh. Macro lenses often has bad bokeh. What's true?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When can we have a test of this one?! I wonder how bokeh is. Something I&#8217;ve seen from time to time is that the closer you can focus the worse the bokeh. Macro lenses often has bad bokeh. What&#8217;s true?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
